- Home ›
- News ›
- Press Releases ›
- AHIP Statement on New National Public-Private Partnership to Reduce Health Care Fraud
AHIP Statement on New National Public-Private Partnership to Reduce Health Care Fraud
For Immediate Release
July 26, 2012
Contact:
Robert Zirkelbach
202-778-8493
Washington, D.C. – America’s Health
Insurance Plans (AHIP) President and CEO Karen Ignagni today released the
following statement on a new national public-private partnership to fight
health care fraud announced by
the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the U.S. Department
of Justice (DOJ):
"The
new partnership announced today is a major step forward in the fight against
fraud and abuse in our health care system. Greater collaboration and
information sharing between the public and private sectors will enable the
nation to more effectively identify fraud early, root it out quickly, and
protect patients from the harmful consequences of fraud.
"The
cost of fraud can far exceed what is paid for falsified claims. It can cause
real harm to patients who are intentionally exposed to radiation, invasive
surgeries, and medications they do not need, or suffer the lasting consequences
of receiving a fraudulent diagnosis.
"Health
plans have prioritized reducing health care fraud and use cutting edge
technology and sophisticated data analysis to prevent fraud from occurring in
the first place rather than 'paying and chasing' after the fact. By
sharing data, information, and best practices across all payers, this
partnership will ensure the public and private sectors are even better equipped
to fight fraud and will provide a powerful deterrent to would-be perpetrators
looking to prey on patients and steal money from taxpayers.
"Health
plans look forward to working with HHS and the DOJ to advance the fight against
health care fraud.”
What
Health Plans are Doing to Fight Fraud
Health
plans operate special investigations units (SIUs) that are staffed with
qualified personnel, including many with statistical, medical, and law
enforcement experience. These SIUs perform sophisticated tasks that include
investigating claims, coordinating with law enforcement personnel, training
in-house personnel to identify and report possible fraud, developing and using
sophisticated software to identify possible fraudulent claims, initiating civil
actions seeking recovery of improper claims payments, and preparing “evidence
packages” of suspected fraudulent providers for the benefit of law enforcement
entities. Health plans also are vigilant about the credentialing of providers
to be included in their networks, and continue to monitor the maintenance of
those credentials to assure quality.
Health
plans focus on preventing and detecting fraud rather than “paying and
chasing” after the fact. The specific tools that health plans use to assure
integrity and detect the delivery of inappropriate or unnecessary care varies
by company, but usually includes the following four categories of activities:
- Identifying potential fraud: The first
step is for the anti-fraud units to develop and use procedures to identify and
detect suspect claims. The goal is to have this occur up-front, and to identify
patterns of performing, ordering, or delivering medically unnecessary
procedures before the claim is paid. Identification of such claims can come
from the health plan’s own systems, where software detects aberrant billing
patterns, using data analysis and other analytics techniques. Information on
suspected cases of fraud also is obtained from law enforcement agencies, as
well as from the National Health Care Anti-Fraud Association (NHCAA). Members
of the public also play an important role, as our members’ fraud “hotlines”
encourage patients as well as providers to report information that helps
identify fraud in real-time, before payments are made.
- “Tagging” suspected cases of fraud: The
second step is for such suspicious claims to be “tagged” for further review
before payment. Health plans have been steadily expanding their use of
technology to increase their capabilities for detecting fraud, such as through
the implementation of electronic “smart flags” or “tags” that quickly identify
potentially false or misleading diagnoses, as well as “mining” of claims
databases to find suspected cases. A particularly important strategy is the
widespread use of predictive modeling to identify suspected cases of fraud by
particular providers, often for a more intensive review before claims are paid.
- Investigating and auditing suspected
fraudulent claims: The next step includes extensive investigation and
auditing of suspected claims, comprising medical record review, clinical
investigations, and coordination with clinical services departments (including
in-house doctors and nurses) to develop appropriate medical opinion of the
legitimacy of the claim. Companies are hiring and training personnel to become
more knowledgeable about health care fraud and prevention, and involving their
auditors in working across multiple disciplines. Those consulted in this review
might include not only clinical and pharmacy personnel, but also state and
federal law enforcement officials.
- Taking action on suspected fraud: While
claims found to be appropriate and accurate would then be paid, claims that are
suspected to be fraudulent would be handled on a case-by-case basis. In certain
cases, facts that may constitute violations of law would be escalated by
referral to a federal or state law enforcement agency (including the FBI and
State Attorneys General) through development of what our special investigations
units call an “evidence package” detailing the possible fraud. Health plans’
data, including extensive computer runs, are valuable evidence for prosecutors
in subsequent trials.
An
AHIP Research Brief entitled “Insurers’
Efforts to Prevent Health Care Fraud” highlights health plans’ innovative
fraud prevention and detection programs and the cost-savings that have been
achieved as a result of these initiatives. According to the survey, large
companies estimated net savings from anti-fraud operations (savings less costs)
of over $3 per enrollee, resulting in total net savings of nearly $300 million
in 2008. Medium-sized companies estimated net savings of about $1 per
enrollee, or $10 million net savings in 2008, and smaller companies estimated
net savings of about $2.70 per enrollee, with approximately $5 million in total
savings.
###
Providing Health Benefits for Over 200 Million Americans.